conflict resolution
amanda smith byron
that we might consider ourselves all experts
the onion of conflict resolution
interdisciplinary field
something that has developed over th last 20 years
field of inquiry
still definging itself
specialization
philosophical approach
robert gould a philosopher at PSU
U of O
paralegal ADR focus
we look at social justice
international justice intercultural
intrapersonal conflict
stress within own life
interpersonal with others
on the outside
valuable and informs alll the other kinds of conflict---interpersonal conflicts are a part of group conflicts
nature of workplace conflict
structural
racism
ethnic
piolitical
economic
political environmental global
PTSD
speak in low tones
non-accusatory
fight and light
george mason university---DOD funded
specializes in doublespeak
peacekeeping deception socialized
troops
move away from conflict bad/resolution good dichotomy
sturm and drang
tensions
gravity
polarizations
productive or destructive conflict
dangerous to build dichotomies
overly simplistic
as destructive phenomenon
language as violence
linguistic violence
irigaray
sexism within french!
who we are and what the world is like
conflict a productive or constructive phenomenon
abuse is never okay
no stereotype
what if
understood conflict to negotiate it more effectively
workplace drama
patriarchy
religions
family parent child
road rage
$
power
friction
violence
culture
growth
opportunity
oppression
pain
disconnect
productive constructive
competition
dominance
skillful mediation
divorce
white supremacist patriarchal
miscommunication
imperialism
dominant culture model of mediation
ignorance
death
competative model
value/belief
perception
loss of home
communications
war
destructive
shift competative dynamic
bail-outs
imbalance
compromise
scheduling
instructor
oversimplify
passion
friend
existence
boss
stress
illness
tension
stretching
ATAVISM
HISTORICAL EONS OF OPPRESSION
healing
perseverence
frustrations
destributive negotiation
------limited resources and inevitable competition
positional bargaining---i want the orange!!!
integrative negotion---we dont know that we are in competition
ask why? interest based bargaining
take zest, take juice---a win-win is possible----dont presume competition---non-competative model---radical way of approaching conflict---different systems---positional bargaining---
mutually satisfying outcomes---the orange---fight over it
TOOL: curiosity
when terrified not very curious----create ease---then there is the capacity to be curious about the situation
implementation
breathe
sacrafice
empathy
progress
time
ground rules
perseverence
serenity
trust
war
respect
non-judgement
acceptance
mediation
time
intention
relative
impulsive
interpretive
confusion
combatting
conflict resolution communication
clear clarity
open ended
dont impte blame right off the bat
respectful
tone/approach
eye contact
relationship focus
empathy
allow venting
empathy for frustration
calm---dangerous---to be hushed and civilized---
concise
third party
sharing stories
active listening
no blame
empathy
compassion
non combative
understanding
patience
sharing stories
use I not you
accountability
I feel like feeling response
isolate the issue
active listening
desire to reach out
active problem solving
interactive\strengths based
honesty
theater of the oppressed
isolating
issue
honesty truth tact
reflection/reflective
what works in conflict resolution
emulate in conversation
in papers
the exchanges
desire to reach out
feminist discourse
radiacal notion that all human beings have value
negativity cast upon the word
dispel
radical notion that all humans are of value
post-gender
rogerian argumentation
debate club
rogerian says why not come up with a discourse we find a way to find common ground bc this is more challenging
this is right
this is wrong
whta is more interesting
there is lots of common ground---not sensational
differences have context
conflict resolution communication
judgement with explanation
we dont have judgment with explanation
ground rules
parameters within class
ground rules
not talking over each other
slur epithets
speaking/don’t dominate
diversity of presentation
amanda smith byron
that we might consider ourselves all experts
the onion of conflict resolution
interdisciplinary field
something that has developed over th last 20 years
field of inquiry
still definging itself
specialization
philosophical approach
robert gould a philosopher at PSU
U of O
paralegal ADR focus
we look at social justice
international justice intercultural
intrapersonal conflict
stress within own life
interpersonal with others
on the outside
valuable and informs alll the other kinds of conflict---interpersonal conflicts are a part of group conflicts
nature of workplace conflict
structural
racism
ethnic
piolitical
economic
political environmental global
PTSD
speak in low tones
non-accusatory
fight and light
george mason university---DOD funded
specializes in doublespeak
peacekeeping deception socialized
troops
move away from conflict bad/resolution good dichotomy
sturm and drang
tensions
gravity
polarizations
productive or destructive conflict
dangerous to build dichotomies
overly simplistic
as destructive phenomenon
language as violence
linguistic violence
irigaray
sexism within french!
who we are and what the world is like
conflict a productive or constructive phenomenon
abuse is never okay
no stereotype
what if
understood conflict to negotiate it more effectively
workplace drama
patriarchy
religions
family parent child
road rage
$
power
friction
violence
culture
growth
opportunity
oppression
pain
disconnect
productive constructive
competition
dominance
skillful mediation
divorce
white supremacist patriarchal
miscommunication
imperialism
dominant culture model of mediation
ignorance
death
competative model
value/belief
perception
loss of home
communications
war
destructive
shift competative dynamic
bail-outs
imbalance
compromise
scheduling
instructor
oversimplify
passion
friend
existence
boss
stress
illness
tension
stretching
ATAVISM
HISTORICAL EONS OF OPPRESSION
healing
perseverence
frustrations
destributive negotiation
------limited resources and inevitable competition
positional bargaining---i want the orange!!!
integrative negotion---we dont know that we are in competition
ask why? interest based bargaining
take zest, take juice---a win-win is possible----dont presume competition---non-competative model---radical way of approaching conflict---different systems---positional bargaining---
mutually satisfying outcomes---the orange---fight over it
TOOL: curiosity
when terrified not very curious----create ease---then there is the capacity to be curious about the situation
implementation
breathe
sacrafice
empathy
progress
time
ground rules
perseverence
serenity
trust
war
respect
non-judgement
acceptance
mediation
time
intention
relative
impulsive
interpretive
confusion
combatting
conflict resolution communication
clear clarity
open ended
dont impte blame right off the bat
respectful
tone/approach
eye contact
relationship focus
empathy
allow venting
empathy for frustration
calm---dangerous---to be hushed and civilized---
concise
third party
sharing stories
active listening
no blame
empathy
compassion
non combative
understanding
patience
sharing stories
use I not you
accountability
I feel like feeling response
isolate the issue
active listening
desire to reach out
active problem solving
interactive\strengths based
honesty
theater of the oppressed
isolating
issue
honesty truth tact
reflection/reflective
what works in conflict resolution
emulate in conversation
in papers
the exchanges
desire to reach out
feminist discourse
radiacal notion that all human beings have value
negativity cast upon the word
dispel
radical notion that all humans are of value
post-gender
rogerian argumentation
debate club
rogerian says why not come up with a discourse we find a way to find common ground bc this is more challenging
this is right
this is wrong
whta is more interesting
there is lots of common ground---not sensational
differences have context
conflict resolution communication
judgement with explanation
we dont have judgment with explanation
ground rules
parameters within class
ground rules
not talking over each other
slur epithets
speaking/don’t dominate
diversity of presentation
No comments:
Post a Comment